Game Fishing Forum banner
1 - 2 of 2 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,717 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
This will probably start a good debate, but I want some opinions. Who is more harmful? Tribal fisherys or Commercial?

Mods, if this gets to rough just take it down. I'll understand.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
867 Posts
At least the tribes, which is also commercial, do some work to help restore salmon. Unless someone can show me otherwise, non tribal commercials just take and are only concerned with making a buck. If I could only get rid of one it would be regular commercial fisherman in the puget sound. The chum were raped this year by commercials and you can only imagine the by-catch to other species as well. I wish this state had a wild fish release, no non-tribal commercials, and tribes getting half of what they take now or a form of true selective harvest, I know Im dreaming though.
 
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
Top