Cant believe where we are headed, and despite having two good eyes, some of you make Stevie Wonder look like freekin Galileo. OB1, did you really just suggest saying yes sir and yes mam???? That's messed up dude.

Cant believe where we are headed, and despite having two good eyes, some of you make Stevie Wonder look like freekin Galileo. 
OB-1 wrote:Clockwork wrote:
me my dad and mom were at the kingdome when i was about 8. a guy got pissed at my dad in the hallway and attacked him. my dad grabbed the guy and slammed him into the wall which is all the cops saw. they wrenched his arm way behind his back messing up his shoulder bad then slammed him face down into the concrete floor. the other guy took off. dad has a bad shoulder to this day.
his freind also got a billy club beatdown when cops came into his backyard because he was lighting off illegal firecrackers. he said get off my property you dont have a warrant. they beat him down with clubs and then took off without any kind of paperwork or anything. just came in beat him then split.
If what you say happened to your father actually happened EXACTLY as you said it did then in that case the police were in the wrong and behaved poorly but most of those officers working events are "Off-duty" and are hired by the event sponsor for security and there-fore not working in their official capacity as officers of the law.
Your dad's friend needs to learn the laws and learn to keep his mouth shut when he is committing a crime. The police do not need a warrant to walk on to your property if there is a crime being committed and by your own admission the guy was committing a crime, it was a minor one but it was still a crime.
Had the police arrested and charged him with a crime they would have needed a warrant to enter the house or any other structure on the property for the purpose of collecting evidence but, since your dads friend was committing his crime right out in the open for all to see no warrant was necessary.
When he responded with "Get off my property" he became confrontational and, as I am assuming it was a 4th of July party by the fact he was setting off fireworks, there was a fair chance that he had been drinking that day also. A confrontational and intoxicated person can be very dangerous and especially since I am pretty sure the Officers were out numbered they very easily could have felt that their safety could have been threatened and if that were the case their actions could be seen as justified.
There are always a few bad apples in the barrel but, as a whole I am sure that most people that weren't committing a crime have not had violent encounters with police. For every video of an officer taking things to far there are probably 10 or more videos of officers behaving professionally and respectfully right up to the point that they were killed or attacked by the perpetrator they were trying to apprehend.
My point to my original post was two-fold:
1) That garbage videos like the one Gene posted do nothing for anyone except to identify the creators as either jerks trying to stir up hatred of the police in an effort to capitalize on the situation and make a fast buck or, as individuals having issues with authority figures.
2)If you dont want to have a potentially violent encounter with the police then don't break the law or, if you do follow the instructions given to you by the police quickly, quietly, don't resist, and saying, 'Yes Ma'am" and "Yes sir" wont hurt your case either.
When he responded with "Get off my property" he became confrontational and, as I am assuming it was a 4th of July party by the fact he was setting off fireworks, there was a fair chance that he had been drinking that day also. A confrontational and intoxicated person can be very dangerous and especially since I am pretty sure the Officers were out numbered they very easily could have felt that their safety could have been threatened and if that were the case their actions could be seen as justified.
Cowlitzfisherman wrote:There was just as likely, "a fair chance" that the officers also had been drinking that day also
Cowlitzfisherman wrote:There was just as likely, "a fair chance" that the officers also had been drinking that day also
Chuck S wrote:fishinfoolz wrote: We live in a police State with law enforcement brutalizing it's citizenry every day.
That is complete bullshiiit and you know it.
We live in a area that has a few bad cops. To generalize them is retarded.
cowlitzriverfisher wrote:Chuck S wrote:fishinfoolz wrote: We live in a police State with law enforcement brutalizing it's citizenry every day.
That is complete bullshiiit and you know it.
We live in a area that has a few bad cops. To generalize them is retarded.
Considering who posted this it makes perfect sense.
Some people in this word believe whatever they want to believe, whether they know what they are talking about or not!

) As the people came running out the apartment complex, police were there in a gauntlet formation beating the tentants within an inch of their lives as they passed the gauntlet. 
streamer wrote:clockwork,
Look who the producer of the video is. If that isn't a prime example of propaganda I don't know what is. The hip-hop community is quite often anti-law enforcement. Find me a credible source preaching the same thing that doesn't have some sort of agenda and I may be a bit more willing to listen.
Second, "we're innocent until proven guilty for a REASON" is irrelevant to the discussion. When people are resisting arrest, they are subject to force. That is not your excuse to resist arrest. If you don't resist it won't happen. If it does, then you have something, but that is generally not the case.
When police officers come across as being soft, they are exposing danger to both themselves, and others. Period.
Does police brutality happen? Absolutely. Does it happen as often as many preach? No. Make sure you have all the facts before jumping on the bandwagon.
Streamer
Hairlipangler wrote:There are hundreds of examples citing police officers rising above and beyond the average job description. Don't think I read it any different, anywhere in this thread. The Edmonds cops are judged by their actions, selfless and heroic.
John T Williams (the Seattle woodcarver shot and killed by officer Ian Birk) and other examples of police inappropriateness are also judged by their own independent actions, as cowardly and criminal.
Yes the Edmonds police officers involved deserve our respect, loyalty, and appreciation.
When police officers like Ian Birk practice "agency sanctioned murder", or club somebody and the like, they deserve to be judged by their peers for their criminal conduct.
It doesn't matter how many examples you post, the two still exist.
streamer wrote:Cowlitzfisherman wrote:There was just as likely, "a fair chance" that the officers also had been drinking that day also
I'm more inclined to believe the "gentleman" would be drinking before a police officer would while on duty.![]()
Streamer

Krijack wrote:"two bad apples does not ruin the whole barrel." Try putting two bad apples in a barrel of good apples, then after a a week check to see how they are fairing, then check in two weeks.
Never been beaten, but have been threatened, watched a few officers start to loose it on a suspect, had a freind murdered by a cop, my father was rob by who we are pretty sure was some of Sheriff Jankovich's men, I been wrongly arrested, watched an officer perjure himself, and the list goes on and on and on. Oneofficer I know had a broken wrist. Seems while he was trying to handcuff a suspect the other officers missed with one of their blows hit him by accident. From what I know, in over 20 years as an officer that was his only serious injury.
I am religious, non-drinking, and straight laced as they come, and still have little respect for police in general. I try, but its just hard.
Do what you are told. If they say get on the ground, then get on the ground. If they say be quiet, then be quiet. It really is quite simple.
Krijack wrote:So, what you are saying is, "If there are 2 bad cops in a dept., they are going to make more cops bad." There are two aspects to this.
The first, is, yes, if bad officers are ignored then others will start to push the line. Eventually you end up with the bad controlling the good. When there is no accountability, it seems that human nature leads people down a road where they don't think they would ever go. In Pierce County, two officers just lost their jobs for perjuring themselves. From every indication I got talking to someone who knows them, one officer decided to take care of a problem and the other tried to cover for him. Niether was a "bad cop". they just felt they could get away with pushing the rules.
The second aspect of this is that it creates situations where the public will not trust the department and every once in a while some crazy will get pushed over the line and kill an officer. I once was dealing with a public employee that was out of control One day I complained to a co-worker of his and he said, "we all hate him. Once anyone has dealt with him they hate us all with a passion." I personally believe that 95% of all officers are probably good people, but due to my experiences I trust almost none of them.
Skorzeny wrote:Just curious. Why would anyone get in a fist fight with an officer?
It is one of those, 3 of a kind don't beat a straight, issues. Unless he was trying to sodomize you, why the fight?
Return to The Camp Fire! General Discussions
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest